Faculty of Economics Search GGDC News GGDC home Top picture

GGDC logo


Archive: 60-Industry Database (2-2005)


All series derived from this database need to be referred to as:
"Groningen Growth and Development Centre, 60-Industry Database, February 2005, http://www.ggdc.net"

The 60-Industry Database provides a comprehensive internationally comparable dataset on industrial performance at a detailed industry level for OECD countries and Taiwan. Variables covered include value added in current and constant prices, value added deflators, persons engaged, number of employees, hours worked, labour productivity and labour compensation. The data cover 56 industries for the period 1979-2002. The database is described in detail in the following document about data sources and methodology.

The first version of this database was constructed in 2003 in co-operation with the National Institute for Economic and Social Research and was financially supported by the European Commission, DG Enterprise. A first update has been published in October 2004. This February update is an intermediate update, which was mainly triggered by suggestions of various users to make our treatment of ICT goods deflators more transparent. In addition to this, we took the opportunity to revise a limited set of industry series on the basis of new information. The differences with the October 2004 version of the 60-industry database are described in the comparison with the previous version.

The database is comparable with the OECD STAN Database, which was used as the point of departure here. However, in order to reach a greater degree of industry detail, and to provide a comprehensive dataset without gaps, OECD STAN data were complemented with information from industry and services statistics and additional (historical) national accounts data for individual countries. The spreadsheets associated with each of the country files (sources and methods) provide a full account of the sources used for each country, each year and each variable.

It should be stressed that the estimates for the total economy are aggregated across industries and that, given several adjustments at industry level, the aggregate results are not fully consistent with the national accounts aggregates (see the sources and methods document). It is also underlined that value data in this database are expressed in national prices. Hence figures for EU countries in euros do therefore not reflect a correction for purchasing power parities (see for example, ICOP Industry Database for PPP converted estimates for manufacturing industries).

Please note that this is an old version of the 60-industry database, available for reproducing results of papers and other work based on this dataset. Proceed to the current 60-industry database for the latest data.

Downloadable country files:


Country

Sources and methods

Latest update

Australia Australia February 2005
Austria Austria February 2005
Belgium Belgium February 2005
Canada Canada February 2005
Czech Republic (1993-2002) Czech Republic February 2005
Denmark Denmark February 2005
European Union (15 countries) February 2005
Finland Finland February 2005
France France February 2005
Unified Germany Unified Germany February 2005
West Germany West Germany February 2005
Greece Greece February 2005
Hungary (1993-2002) Hungary February 2005
Ireland Ireland February 2005
Italy Italy February 2005
Japan Japan February 2005
Korea Korea February 2005
Luxembourg Luxembourg February 2005
Netherlands Netherlands February 2005
Norway Norway February 2005
Poland (1993-2002) Poland February 2005
Portugal Portugal February 2005
Slovakia (1993-2002) Slovakia February 2005
Spain Spain February 2005
Sweden Sweden February 2005
Switzerland (1990-2000) General source notes October 2002
Taiwan Taiwan February 2005
United Kingdom United Kingdom February 2005
United States United States February 2005

A detailed example of the computation of aggregate deflators using the Tornqvist index can be found in a separate example-file.
The U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) has published a note about chained-dollar indexes. This note explains the advantages of chain indexes and why value added in constant prices cannot simply be added up if it is calculated using a chain-weighted index. The BEA uses Fisher indices to aggregate across industries while the GGDC uses Törnqvist indices. The practical differences between the indices will normally be quite small.

The responsibility for this database is entirely that of the Groningen Growth and Development Centre, and not that of the European Commission or any other institution.


Previous versions of this database

The 60-Industry database has been extended, updated and improved over time. The earlier versions of the database that have been used in the papers below are still available for replicating results:

  • 60-Industry Database (October 2004)

  • O'Mahony, M. and van Ark, B., eds.(2003), EU Productivity and Competitiveness: An Industry Perspective Can Europe Resume the Catching-up Process?, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 2003.
    Underlying data:
    60-Industry Database (October 2003)

  • Ark, B. van, R. Inklaar and R.H. McGuckin (2002), 'Changing Gear': Productivity, ICT and Service Industries: Europe and the United States, GGDC Research Memorandum GD-60.
    Underlying data:
    60-Industry Database (July 2003)

  • Ark, B. van (2001), The Renewal of the Old Economy: Europe in an Internationally Comparative Perspective, OECD STI Working Paper, no. 2001/5
    Underlying data:
    ICT Database (2001). This version uses a somewhat different classification of ICT-using industries and covers the period from 1990 to 1998-1999.

    Examples of research based on this database

  • The 60-Industry Database has been originally devised for a study developed by the Groningen Growth and Development Centre and the National Institute for Economic and Social Research, which was was commissioned by the European Commission, DG Enterprise. This study, EU Productivity and Competitiveness: An Industry Perspective Can Europe Resume the Catching-up Process? (M. O'Mahony and B. van Ark, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 2003)gives a clear view of the productivity situation of the countries in the European Union.

  • A study by the European Commission, DG ECFIN, An analysis of EU and US productivity developments: a total economy and industry level perspective (Cécile Denis, Kieran McMorrow and Werner Röger, DG for Economic and Financial Affairs, 2004) makes a detailed policy-related analysis.

  • A study, Fostering excellence: Challenges for productivity growth in Europe , which was prepared for the Dutch presidency of the European Union as a background document for the Informal Competitiveness Council Maastricht (1st-3rd July 2004).  

  • IMPORTANT: If you send an email to GGDC@eco.rug.nl, stating your name, emailaddress, affiliation, postal address, phone and faxnumber, you will be informed of extensions and updates of our databases.


    Go to top of page

    Mail to GGDC Reactions to this page
    Last changed on: 17 October 2006